4:1. मी जे म्हणत आहे ते हे की, जोपर्यंत वारसदार हा लहान मूल आहे तोपर्यंत तो गुलामापेक्षा वेगळा नाही. जरी तो सर्वांचामालक असला तरी,

4:1. Now I mean that the heir, as long as he is a minor, is no different from a slave, though he is the owner of everything.

4:1. Think of it this way. If a father dies and leaves an inheritance for his young children, those children are not much better off than slaves until they grow up, even though they actually own everything their father had.

4:1. But I say that so long as the heir is a child, he differeth nothing from a bondservant though he is lord of all;

4:1. I mean that the heir, as long as he is a child, is no different from a slave, though he is the owner of everything,

4:1. Now I say, [That] the heir, as long as he is a child, differeth nothing from a servant, though he be lord of all;

4:1. I mean that the heir, as long as he is a child, is no better than a slave, though he is the owner of all the estate;

4:1. But I say that so long as the heir is a child, he differeth nothing from a bondservant, though he is lord of all;

4:1. And I say, so long time as the heir is a babe, he differeth nothing from a servant -- being lord of all,

4:1. This is what I am saying: When young children inherit all that their father owned, they are still no different from his slaves. It doesn't matter that they own everything.

4:1. But I say that so long as the heir is a child, he is no different from a bondservant, though he is lord of all;

4:1. Now G1161 I say, G3004 [That] the G3588 heir, G2818 as long as G3745 he G5550 is G2076 a child, G3516 differeth G1308 nothing G3762 from a servant, G1401 though he be G5607 lord G2962 of all; G3956